Obey the Truth–Gal 3:1-5

Gal 3:1-5 says,
¶O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
4 Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.
5 He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

This passage establishes seven fundamental truths about God, truth, and God’s word. They are:

1. There is truth. Every word men may devise is NOT necessarily true. If every word of man was true, Paul would not have found it necessary to write a letter to Galatia that defended truth.
2. God’s word is truth. Paul had preached God’s word to the Galatians and he defends the word he had preached as truth.
3. It is possible to know truth. Paul expected the Galatians to recognize what they had been taught as truth.
4. God does have a will for man. If God did not have a will, He would not have spoken through Paul, and Paul would not have reminded the Galatians that he had spoken God’s revealed will to them.
5. It is possible to pervert God’s truth into a lie. Being bewitched is to be deceived into believing a lie.
6. It is possible to be led astray from the truth. Paul was afraid the Galatians were so perverted as to be fallen from God’s grace (Gal 5:4).
7. Not every thing that one does in the name of religion is acceptable to God. You can’t believe just anything you choose to believe and still remain pleasing to God.

Men cannot teach just anything they please, call it the truth, and expect God to be happy with the result. God has a law and He expects men to learn it and follow it.

Posted in Biblical Studies, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our Experience With Hurricane Ike Versus What Happened With Katrina

My wife and I were in Conroe, TX about 50 miles north of Houston and 100 miles north of Galveston on the night that Ike went through. The eye of the storm went over us about 5 AM on Sat 13 Sep 08. The power went out and stayed out until Wednesday evening. My son still does not have power at his job site and has not been able to return to full duty.

When the storm came through, we had gusts in excess of 100 mph in Conroe. Very many trees and limbs were blown down.

My wife and I left the Houston area about 4 PM on Sat, just a few hours after the storm. Conditions had improved considerably in Houston, so we set out following the storm up the border of East Texas. We had to stop at times for road crews that were clearing the road of trees and debris because we were behind a caravan of power trucks that were out trying to start fixing the grid. We probably passed hundreds of places in 400 miles where trees had fallen across the road, but it was open. The Texas road department had done a wonderful job keeping the roads open. I was very surprised. We passed two places where they were still clearing trees off the road, but one lane was open. In many places there was so much litter on the road that the road was covered with tree debris except for the tire tracks.

There was so much damage to the power lines that I didn’t see how they would get it fixed in months, let alone days. In some places there were trees on the lines every 100 yards and in some places the poles were broken and the lines were in tangle on the ground. In the 300 miles from Houston to Texarkana we found one gas station that was open. Almost all of East Texas had no power. The closer we got to Texarkana, the worse the weather got. By the time we got to Texarkana, we were getting gale force winds and at times, torrential rain. We had hoped to have power in Texarkana, but just before we got there, the power went down where we were spending the night. It was not until the next day (Sunday) that we got power.

We drove from Texarkana to Little Rock to catch a plane. We were amazed at the dozens and dozens of power trucks and tree trucks that were headed for Houston. We passed probably 150 trucks rushing to assist Houstonians. We saw our Dayton Power and Light trucks and DP&L’s tree management company (Asplundh) headed south for Houston.

We drove on up to Little Rock and caught a plane to Dayton. We got stranded in Atlanta because the Dayton bound plane was overbooked. Two earlier flights had been cancelled due to hurricane force winds in Dayton and many people were trying to get back to work. From 1 PM – 6 PM Sunday, winds from 50-75 mph buffeted Dayton doing extensive damage to the power grid, so we had hurricane force winds in Dayton! Power was out throughout the region and there was no gas or electricity. We followed Ike all the way from Houston to Dayton and it was knocking power out all along the way. We went from Sat – Tues with no power.

We got back to Dayton Monday afternoon and the power was on at the airport and some places in Vandalia. I filled up the car with gas and headed back home. My son had cranked up our generator and was keeping the freezer going, but he was concerned about lack of gas. On the way home I saw where a station had just opened, and when I got home, I rushed around and got some gas cans, and went back to the station. In the 20 minutes it took me to do that, the station had gotten busy as people learned it was open. I was blessed to get gas quickly and get back to the house. By the time I left, there were people lined up out to the street.

At home I hooked up a drop light to the generator, and we had light by which to read. We were the only ones around that had any power. Our power finally came back on Tuesday afternoon, so it was off from Sun – Tues. My son’s power in Conroe was off from early Sat through Wed. There are many places that still do not have power, and it may be another week before most people get their power back on. The recovery effort here was seriously hampered by the fact that DP&L had sent most of its crews and tree contractors to Houston. They had to call them back, but it takes two days to get back from Houston. My oldest son’s job site does not expect to have power before Monday. A week after the storm, there are still tens of thousands of people in the area without electricity. One does not expect a hurricane in Dayton, OH, but that is what we got. We experienced damage from hurricane force winds from Houston to Texarkana to Dayton.

It has been a rough week, but thanks be to God we did not experience severe damage. We had some big branches knocked down, but nothing fell on the house. Across the street our neighbors lost five trees and some neighbors had roof damage. My oldest son had replaced our roof about 5 years ago, and it held. I told him, “Good job!”. On the access road to our house, a big tree fell across the road and smashed a pickup, blocking access down that road. My oldest son’s wife was driving in the wind on Sunday. The power lines had fallen across the road, so she turned around to go another way and a tree fell in front of her. She was trapped between downed power lines and a tree. She managed to escape by driving up in the yard.

Probably everybody here has a story to tell, but it has been, as the old Chinese curse has it, “living in interesting times”. I only missed one day of work, but other people were not so lucky. The gas stations and restaurants that had power were swamped with business, but most of them have been losing money because they have no power. Many places were not able to work. I was concerned about my job location, because if we had lost power downtown, it would have put 200 stores in five states out of business. As it was, we only lost 20 stores due to power outages at the individual stores.

Downtown Dayton lost power for a while and the mayor was very concerned about looting. They do not call Dayton “Little Detroit” for no reason. Dayton called out every cop they could find and shut the court house early. They put court baliffs on street patrol and put out a curfew, but the situation was very quiet. Everybody was busy dealing with problems at home and trying to figure out how they were going to get food and gas.

I hope most of you did not experience problems, but we seemed, like the ancient mariner, to have an albatross around our neck last week . I was impressed with the orderliness and discipline displayed by Americans in the aftermath of the storm. There was none of the anarchy that characterized the days after Katrina in New Orleans. There was no looting and no snipers. The people that were damaged were the true Americans and not the result of generations of people living in a godless social welfare state. The contrast is stark, and you can see what is coming as Christianity loses its influence. May God help us all.

Posted in Personal | Leave a comment

Why Are We Still Here?

God accomplished His eternal purpose in saving man by the death of Christ and His resurrection. Why did God not end the world shortly thereafter? Why has the world dragged on for 2000 years after Jesus victory over sin? One reason is that God is waiting for the harvest, and that takes time for the crop to ripen (Mt 13:30). Another reason I just noticed is that God left the world as an object lesson to those in eternity in what happens when you do not completely purge out the old leaven.

Christianity overcame a large part of the world after it its inauguration. It persisted in Europe against all odds until the beginning of Satan’s little season, and it has since declined to the point of having little practical influence there. Christianity is to continue to decline until Christ could wonder if He would even find faith when He comes again (Lk 18:8). Paul also warns that “evil men will wax worse and worse” (II Tim 3:13) and before Jesus comes a falling away will happen first (II Thes 2:3). The destruction of faith and righteousness on the earth brought about by the fact that God permitted the tares to remain until the harvest shows the utter wisdom of God in completely exterminating wickedness and starting over with the new earth. The new earth will have righteous benevolent dictators over its entire administration and these rulers will never be displaced. Because there will always be righteous administration and because all evil minded persons have been removed, righteousness will endure forever. However, had God not permitted the present age to continue until wickedness inevitably destroyed righteousness, then God’s creatures in eternity would not know the necessity of what God did in rooting out and destroying wickedness at the end of this present age. The possiblity would remain that righteousness would convert all of the wicked and utter destruction would not be required. God’s patience in allowing wickedness to destroy goodness shows His righteousness at the end of the age when He comes and utterly destroys the “Amelekites” whose iniquity has become full.

Posted in God's Eternal Purpose | Leave a comment

Why Use Unleavened Bread For the Lord’s Supper?

The unleavened bread used for communion is generally understood to refer to the purity of the sacrifice of Christ. It very well can have connotations of purity, but I wonder if the main reason is different. It seems to me that leavening makes bread alive. When the leaven is missing, bread does not move, but when leaven is present, bread moves and rises because it is alive. Bread is a staple of the body (Mt 4:4, Lk 4:4) and what you eat becomes you, so bread is a good representation of the body. The body of Christ was God’s sacrifice for sin, so bread is a good representation of that sacrifice. I think that unleavened bread represents the fact that the body was dead. Unleavened bread just lays there and does nothing, and hence it is a good representation of a dead body. You can continue the type further to show the death, burial and resurrection. If the bread is a type of the dead body of Christ, when you eat it, it is buried, and when it becomes part of you, it rises to walk in newness of life.

Posted in Biblical Studies | Leave a comment

If Christ Has Paid the Debt For Sin, Why Is There a Judgment and Eternal Hell?

When Christ died, the Devil took His spirit prisoner to Hades (Acts 2:27, I Pe 3:19). Since death was the penalty for sin, Jesus was under no obligation to stay dead. Therefore, the Devil’s act of taking Jesus’ soul to the prison of Hades amounted to kidnapping God’s son. That was an act of war, and both Jesus and God were justified in resisting Jesus’ incarceration with force. According to the parables, Jesus was stronger than the Devil, overcame him and spoiled him of his goods (Mt 12:29, Mk 3:27). Among other things, Jesus took the keys of Death and Hades (Rev 1:18), and He thereby gained power over the dead. Because of Jesus’ power over the dead, He has power over every man (Heb 9:27). Because He now has a lawful claim over the soul of every man, He plans to raise the dead and restore all things (Acts 3:21).

In order to restore all things, God must restore peace and harmony, but He has irrevocably given men free will. In order to restore the pristine peace and harmony, those men who choose to introduce chaos by refusing to obey God must be removed from the earth. In order to determine who is fit to participate, God has decreed that there is to be a judgment where each man’s works can be examined. This judgment will determine those fit to enter the world to come. How is fitness determined? Certainly not by perfect obedience (Rom 3:20), if Christ died for all men and God is just, how can He justly send men to hell? Since Christ has died and provided a legal basis for justification, God’s decision is based on grace AND truth (Jn 1:17). However, grace does not forbid punishment for those men that are unrepentant and willing to obey truth. Many people have shown a disposition to disobey. Because of their willful disobedience, God can do nothing further for them (Heb 10:26), for He has irrevocably given men free will (Ro 11:29), yet some men are willfully disobedient. If God released these willful sinners on the new earth, they would continue their willful ways. We know that is the case, for after God destroyed the earth by flood, the angels that sinned appear to have continued their sinful ways, since their giant progeny appear, even after the Flood (Gen 6:4, Num 13:33, Dt 2:20). It was not until God imprisoned them (II Pet 2:4) that the production of giants ceased.

Because Jesus now has the keys of Death and Hades, God can now hold the Judgment (Jn 12:31), because Christ has lawfully obtained possession of the souls of men and He is going to raise the dead and restore all things. There is eternal hell because some men of free-will will not accept God’s rule and He is not willing to ruin the world to come by letting willful rebels run amok on it.

Posted in Life After Death, Soteriology | Leave a comment

Why Was Christ’s Death Adequate for Sin?

Since Christ was made to be sin for us (II Cor 5:21), why was God just in raising Him from the dead? If Jesus bore our stripes, which He did (Isa 53:5, I Pet 2:24), why could God arbitrarily forgive Jesus and not just as readily arbitrarily forgive us? This question presumes an error, since it presumes that the debt for all sin was not paid by the death of Christ. What was the debt for sin? The debt for sin was death (Rom 6:23). Since Jesus died for sin, the debt was paid. Why then since all men die do they not pay their debt for sin? Because their death is obligated to Adam’s sin (Gen 3:17). Adam’s children are already cursed to die because of his transgression. Therefore, no man can die to atone for his own sin, since his death is already obligated. However, God did not decree that one must stay dead for ever, for if He did, there could be no resurrection of the dead. He simply said that the sinner must die (Gen 3:19, Ezek 18:20, Heb 9:27). Because Jesus was the Son of God and not the son of Adam, He was not under Adam’s curse of returning to dust (Gen 3:19), and Jesus therefore had an unobligated life to give. Since He lived sinlessly (Heb 4:15), He was not under any obligation to die as the wage for His own sin. Since Jesus is Creator (Jn 1:1-3), He is worth more than His creation (Rom 9:20). Therefore, when Jesus died, His death fully paid the debt for all sins for every thing that might sin in the entire creation for ever (Col 2:14, Heb 9:12). Since death was the full penalty for sin, after Jesus died the debt was paid. The penalty for sin was not being dead for ever or burning for ever, it was death itself. Therefore, God was entirely just and justifed in raising Christ from the dead.

Why did Christ’s death suffice for sin? God is much greater than the creation, and while it is true that Jesus is Creator (Jn 1:1-3), that fact alone does not justify God in accepting the sacrifice of Christ for affronts of Christ’s creation against the Father. It appears that only a sinless, uncursed, creator, Son of God that was God’s “fellow” (Zech 13:7) would be sufficient. The fact that Christ was a Peer of God made His life of equal worth. When Christ died, it was equal dying for affronts against His equal. That was sufficient to satisfy God’s justice.

Posted in God's Eternal Purpose, Soteriology | Leave a comment

The Two Adams

Adam was the son of God (Lk 3:38), just as Jesus was the son of God (Mk 1:1), the difference being that Jesus was the only begotten of the Father (Jn 1:14). There are interesting parallels between Adam and Jesus, even to the point that Paul calls Adam “the first man” and Jesus “the second man” (I Cor 15:45-47). In essence, Jesus was the second Adam.

Both Jesus and Adam have the distinction of having sinless and unfettered adult lives. Adam was a perfect, curse-free man, but God gave Him a law. If Adam broke that law, God promised that the wages for breaking God’s law would be death. Adam broke God’s law, and he died. He paid the wages of sin, and was thereafter debt free, for his death atoned for his sin. However, his death atoned for his sin and his alone, and God cursed Adam’s seed such that Adam’s seed (everyone descended from him) could not redeem their souls by death. Adam’s children could not save themselves by death, for God required the death of Adam’s children as a consequence of Adam’s sin (Gen 3:19). Because they were part of Adam, and Adam was doomed totally die, Adam’s children had to die. Thus death passed upon all men, even those that have not sinned after the manner of Adam’s sin (Rom 5:12, 14). Thus Adam could save himself by his death, but he could not save others. Adam’s lack dramatically pointed out the need for another Son of God, a Savior, one who could not only save himself, but also save others (Mk 15:31). God sent His only begotten Son, born free from Adam’s curse, to give His unobligated life as a ransom for the sins of the world (Mt 20:28).

Because the seed of Adam are under the curse of death, their lives are in foreclosure from the moment of conception. Consequently, should they sin, as men ultimately do (I Ki 8:46, Ro 3:23), there is nothing they can do to redeem their souls. It was the Second Adam, the Lamb of God (Gen 22:8, Jn 1:29), sacrificed for the sins of the whole world (II Cor 5:14) that provided helpless men with the salvation they so desperately required (Jn 3:16). His vicarious suffering and death satisfied the legal requirements of God’s justice, and permits God to forgive men and remain wholly righteous. Jesus, in effect, died the death we could not die. Adam saved himself, but could not save others. Jesus saved others, but could not save Himself. The first Adam plunged men into sin and death in order that God might work an eternal remedy for Sin. The second Adam undid the Fall, will restore the earth, and provided salvation from sin and eternal life. Thank God for the two Adams.

Posted in God's Eternal Purpose, Soteriology | Leave a comment

Firstborn Surprise

It is interesting that Jesus is the first-born and we are the first-born with Him (Rom 8:29), but we are not the first-born of Jesus; we are the first-born of God. God is our Father (I Cor 1:3, II Cor 1:2, Eph 1:2), not Jesus. We are married to Jesus (Eph 5:32), but are not His children. The Spirit that He gave to us and by which we are begotten came from His Father (I Jn 5:18, Jas 1:17-18, I Cor 12:8, II Pet 1:21). Like Joseph had many brothers, so does Jesus (Rom 8:29). Like Joseph was the firstborn among his brethren, even so Christ is the firstborn among us. He gets a double portion in His kingdom and the blessing of the Father. Our first-born status is not the rebirth we experience at baptism, but is the rebirth we experience at the resurrection from the dead (Acts 13:33-34, Rev 1:5, Col 1:18). When God and Christ come again, the dead in Christ rise first (I Th 4:16). We are therefore the firstborn ones on the new earth . After the resurrection and Judgment, God’s kingdom expands without bounds for ever (Isa 9:7), and those that come after us will regard us as we do Adam. He is the father of all living now. The firstborn ones (Heb 12:23) will be the fathers of all living in the world to come. Christ is the second Adam from whom we in the church are taken from His side and become the new Eve, His wife. Together in the world to come Christ and the church will be the new Adam and Eve.

It is the established position among the brethren that the Christians are the new Jews. It is true that we will inherit the promises God promised the Seed (Gen 13:15), but we do so because we are married to the true Heir, Jesus, the Messiah, not because we are the new Jews. The position that Christians are the new Jews is called replacement theology. I don’t see evidence for it. I find that “Jews” and “Israel” is almost always used literally in the NT. In Ro 9:6 the term “Israel” is used to stand for “the elect”. In that sense, the elect have always been a smaller portion of Abraham and Isaac’s descendants, as Paul demonstrates from the historical types of Isaac and Ishmael (Rom 9:7), Jacob and Esau (Rom 9:13), and also from the prophet Isaiah (Rom 9:27). The true “Jew” has always been the one that elected to serve God. It was never enough to be a descendant of Abraham (Mt 3:9). The descendant of Abraham had to choose to obey God’s will after he came of age. Then and only then could this one that was born of Israel become a part of true Israel by a personal choice to obey God’s law. The patriarchs (Adam, Enoch, Noah, etc.) became part of this number by their choice to serve God. Those that become Christians become part of this number of true Israel by likewise choosing to serve God. So also do the Jews.

What changed when Christ came was that God took the kingdom away from Israel (Mt 21:43). I understand that kingdom to be comprised of Christ the King, Christ’s law, God’s throne, the territory in heaven, and the church as well as the spirit beings who are in obedience to God that are Christ’s subjects. Our King and kingdom is currently in heaven (Acts 2:34-35, Php 3:20). We are strangers, sojourners and pilgrims in the present age because the present earth is in rebellion to God. Heaven is not, and that is where we go when we die (Php 1:23, II Cor 5:8-9). When God comes again, He brings the spirits of the righteous dead (I Th 4:14) whom He then raises as the firstborn on the new earth.

However, the fact that God took the kingdom from Israel does nothing to negate the promises God made to Israel that they would inherit the land, have a great name, be numerous, and be a blessing. All of these things are still true and will also be true in the new earth, for the promises of Abraham are “an everlasting covenant” (Gen 17:7). There are other promises to Israel and prophecies of Israel that cannot be fulfilled if God has completely given them up. God also specifically said that anyone that touched Israel touched the pupil of God’s eye (Zech 2:8), and that prophecy is in the context of the new earth.

Posted in God's Eternal Purpose, Soteriology | Leave a comment

Does “Temporal Conflict” Explain the Apparent Contradictions in the Coming of Elijah?

>An antagonist wrote: Here is a another view on Matthew 17 and Jesus’ discussion of Elijah who “is coming” and who “already came”:
> Matthew 17:10-12 NASB And His disciples asked Him, “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” (11) And He answered and said, “Elijah is coming and will restore all things; (12) but I say to you that Elijah already came, and they did not recognize him, but did to him whatever they wished. So also the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.”
>
> §My explanation of the future tense:
> –The question is in future tense. The answer corresponded to the question.
> §Question: “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?”
> §Answer (pt.1): “Elijah is coming and will restore all things”
> –This is from the point of view the O.T.
> §Answer (pt.2): but I say that Elijah already came (i.e., John the Baptist)
> –This is from the point of view of the N.T.
>
> We can see the same “temporal conflict” in the language of Jesus in speaking elsewhere:
> John 4:23 NASB”But an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers.
> John 5:25 NASB”Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
> Seeing Jesus use language this way, and seeing the context within Matthew 17, give evidence that there is another interpretation other than Elijah is still yet to come in person.

James replies: If one accepts the position that you have suggested, it leaves the conflct between John’s statement and Jesus’ statement. John said he was not Elijah in the sense of fulfilling the prophecy to which the Jews had reference. Jesus said that John was Elijah in some sense. Either Jesus and John were referring to different things, or there is a flat contradiction between two inspired men. I prefer the former explanation. If you select the former, then it drives you to an explanation of Jesus’ statement in which He was referring to a typical fulfillment of the prophecy regarding Elijah. Obviously, Elijah the Tishbite still existed in the days of Jesus (Mt 17:3), and he had NOT returned in accordance with Malachi’s prophecy (Mal 4:5). And, yes, I know Moses also appeared, and he had been dead for 1500 years, but Elijah had not died (II Ki 2:11), and there are specific prophecies about Elijah’s return at the end of the world (Mal 4:5, Rev 11:3, En 90:31-32, II Esdras 6:25-26, SibOrc II:234-239).

Malachi 4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers

The great and dreadful day of the Lord is the last day, the day when Jesus comes to destroy the wicked (Isa 13:6, 9, Jer 46:10, Ezek 30:2-3, etc.). God did not destroy the wicked in John’s and Jesus’ day.

II Esdras 6
[25] “And it shall be that whoever remains after all that I have foretold to you shall himself be saved and shall see my salvation and the end of my world. [26] And they shall see the men who were taken up, who from their birth have not tasted death

Sibylline Oracles Book II Line 234-239
And then the Tishbite, urging from the heaven
235 His chariot celestial, and on earth
Arriving, shall to all the world display
Three evil signs of life to be destroyed [woe, woe, woe—Rev 8:13]
Alas for all the women in that day
Who shall be found with burden in the womb [Mt 24:19]!

Posted in Biblical Studies, End Times | Leave a comment

God’s Promise to Israel

Frequently, people discuss the issue whether Israel is still God’s chosen people or not. The ones that say that Israel is not God’s chosen point to the scripture that says, “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof” (Mt 21:43). If the kingdom was taken away, then Israel cannot be God’s chosen people. While the idea that Israel is no longer God’s chosen is probably correct, there are some other considerations that are usually ignored. The big thing that is missed is the fact that the kingdom is not all that is involved in God’s relation with Israel. God made some big promises to Abraham back there in Gen 12, 15 and 17. God also made a covenant with Israel that involved the Law. Neither of these directly involved the kingdom. Both of them involved the Land of Canaan.

A salient point to remember is the Law of Moses is still in effect for the Jews (Mt 5:17-18). The Law was part of the covenant that God made with Israel. If they kept His law, He would give them the things that He promised them, including the Land. If they disobeyed, He would evict them from the Land. If they repented, He would bring them back again!

Deuteronomy 30:1 ¶And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee,
2 And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul;
3 That then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee.
4 If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee:
5 And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers.

This promise is from Moses and is part of the Law. It is not a kingdom promise. Therefore, it can be true that another nation (the church–Rev 5:9-10, I Pet 2:9) gets the kingdom, yet Israel still inherits the Land. These are not mutually exclusive promises. Therefore, when we see Israel chastened and thereafter returning to Israel, we should see the fulfillment of Dt 30:1-5, and not be blinded by the fact that the kingdom was taken from Israel.

Posted in Israel | Leave a comment